Book flow 1Discover 2Local library 3Upload 4Verify 5Publish
Duplicate decision #1390

The Sun Also Rises

Possible Duplicate 83% confidence · llm:qwen3.5:9b
Back to review queue
Historical decision. This evidence came from index version 231 and is no longer actionable.
Why this decision was made
The records represent the same literary work ('The Sun Also Rises') by the same author (Ernest Hemingway), but differ in the full name used for the author ('Ernest Hemingway' vs 'Ernest Miller Hemingway'). According to the policy, different editions or volumes are distinct; however, this appears to be a metadata inconsistency regarding the author's full name rather than a materially different edition. Given the high title match (100) and language agreement, they likely refer to the same work, but strict adherence to 'Do not invent identifiers' and the presence of conflicting author name strings suggests caution. However, standard practice for deduplication treats these as the same book with metadata noise. Re-evaluating based on 'materially different editions': neither is an abridgment or adaptation. The difference is purely in the author string normalization. Thus, they represent the same book.
Index version
231
Created
2026-08-16 18:56 UTC
Last updated
2026-09-08 09:08 UTC
Incoming candidate

The Sun Also Rises

upload · 212
Candidate
LitVox public library

The Sun Also Rises

LitVox ID 304
Public

Title similarity100%
Author similarity83%

Decision evidence

Title100
Author83
Language AgreementTrue
Volume ConflictFalse
Edition ConflictFalse
Author ConflictFalse
Relationshipsame_work_author_variant
LLM adjudication details
Decisiondifferent
Confidence0.83
Relationshipsame_work_author_variant
ReasonThe records represent the same literary work ('The Sun Also Rises') by the same author (Ernest Hemingway), but differ in the full name used for the author ('Ernest Hemingway' vs 'Ernest Miller Hemingway'). According to the policy, different editions or volumes are distinct; however, this appears to be a metadata inconsistency regarding the author's full name rather than a materially different edition. Given the high title match (100) and language agreement, they likely refer to the same work, but strict adherence to 'Do not invent identifiers' and the presence of conflicting author name strings suggests caution. However, standard practice for deduplication treats these as the same book with metadata noise. Re-evaluating based on 'materially different editions': neither is an abridgment or adaptation. The difference is purely in the author string normalization. Thus, they represent the same book.
Matched Fieldstitle, language
Conflicting Fieldsauthors_original, authors_normalized

Review history

TimeActionChangeReason
No manual review actions yet.